Reuters: U.S.: Indiana court upholds broadest school voucher program

Reuters: U.S. Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com

Indiana court upholds broadest school voucher program Mar 26th 2013, 17:31 By Stephanie Simon Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:41pm EDT (Reuters) - The Indiana Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously upheld the nation's broadest school voucher program, which lets poor and middle-class students attend private schools at public expense. Opponents, including the state teachers union, had sued to block the program on grounds that nearly all the voucher money has been directed to religious schools. Voucher systems have drawn flak across the United States from critics who say they drain money from public schools and are abused by wealthy families. Supporters say they offer families greater choice on where to educate their children. In a 5-0 vote, the Indiana justices said that it did not matter that funds had been directed to religious schools, so long as parents - and not the state - decide where to use the tuition vouchers. "Whether the Indiana program is wise educational or public policy is not a consideration," Chief Justice Brent Dickson wrote. The program is constitutional, he wrote, because the public funds "do not directly benefit religious schools but rather directly benefit lower-income families with school children." The Supreme Court used similar reasoning in a 2002 ruling upholding a voucher program in Cleveland. Since then, voucher programs have been challenged in state, rather than federal, court. But opponents have found it an uphill climb. Just last month, a state appeals court in Colorado upheld a voucher program that helped parents in one of the wealthiest counties in the U.S. pay private school tuition. The case is on appeal to the Colorado Supreme Court. Another closely-watched voucher case is pending in the Louisiana Supreme Court; a ruling is expected soon. The Indiana voucher program is considered among the broadest in the U.S. because it is not limited to low-income students or those attending failing schools -- and because it is available to children statewide. A family of four with a household income of $64,000 a year is eligible for vouchers worth up to $4,500 per child. This year, more than 9,000 students in Indiana are receiving vouchers; many are using them to pay tuition at parochial schools. Republican Governor Mike Pence has pushed to expand the program by opening eligibility to special-needs students and children in military families if their household income is as high as $85,000 for a family of four. The Indiana legislature is also considering a bill that would give vouchers to kindergarten students who meet the income guidelines. The program currently requires students to spend a full year in public schools before they are eligible for a voucher. Nationally, 12 states and Washington, D.C. offer vouchers to some students. An estimated 100,000 students across the country participate. Teachers have complained that the vouchers divert money from traditional public schools. "Just because the Indiana Supreme Court said it's OK by our constitution doesn't mean this is a good idea," said Teresa Meredith, vice president of the Indiana State Teachers Association and a plaintiff in the case. "I don't believe it's a wise use of public money. It's still, at the end of the day, funding religious instruction" with tax dollars." Supporters of the voucher program predicted that the ruling would clear the way for a rapid expansion of vouchers in Indiana and statewide. "Kids and parents won today," said Robert Enlow, president of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, which supports voucher programs nationally. "Other states should look at this victory and see that the education establishment's ability to obstruct families' freedom to choose is waning." (Reporting by Stephanie Simon, editing by Scott Malone and Andrew Hay) Link this Share this Digg this Email Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions