The biggest change affects how the pension funds project rates of return on their investments.
Pension funds that are considered adequately funded could continue forecasting investment returns in line with their historic averages, usually around 8 percent, under the new GASB rules. It defined those pension systems as having sufficient assets to pay the pension of current employees and retirees, but did not set a funding ratio.
Funds lacking sufficient assets to cover future benefits must lower their projected investment rate to about 3 to 4 percent. Specifically, the investment rate would have to match "a yield or index rate on tax-exempt 20-year, AA-or-higher rated municipal bonds," an information sheet on the changes said. On Friday, the yield for AA-rated municipal bonds due in 20 years was 3.12 percent, according to Municipal Market Data.
Although it sounds like a technical accounting move, this change is key to the pension wars.
Investment earnings provide 60 percent of pension fund revenue. When the investments fail to meet the forecasts, governments - essentially taxpayers - and employees must pitch in money to fill the void. At the depth of the recession in 2008, the return on pension investments fell by 25 percent, Pew found.
Conservative members of the U.S. Congress would like pension systems to use a rate they call "diskless" of about 4 percent. Pension funds counter that they should use rates in-line with historical averages.
According to Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, the rate of decline in U.S. state pension funding has slowed recently, which could result in more states continuing to use their current rates of return under the new GASB system.
Under GASB's changes, governments will have to count their pension obligations as liabilities for the first time. And they will have to post their net pension liability - the difference between the projected benefit payments and the assets set aside to cover those payments - up front on financial statements.
While funds can now spread their costs over many years, the timeline for "smoothing" pension expenses will be shortened.
(Reporting by Lisa Lambert; Editing by Anthony Boadle)
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
0 comments:
Post a Comment