Marcavage filed a separate civil case seeking damages from the federal government, the National Park Service and two park rangers, alleging violations of his rights under the U.S. Constitution.
In February, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected his civil case. It said the rangers had qualified immunity, and that Marcavage was treated differently from others on the sidewalk because he was demonstrating without a permit, making too much noise, and potentially interfering with traffic.
On appeal, Marcavage had claimed that a sidewalk is a traditional public forum for speech. He said the 3rd Circuit struck an improper balance between legitimate law enforcement efforts and letting people exercise their rights.
The case is Marcavage v. Saperstein et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 11-1402.
(Editing by Howard Goller and Mohammad Zargham)
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
0 comments:
Post a Comment