- Tweet
- Share this
- Email
- Print
Highlights from all the NCAA brackets. Slideshow
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b121/3b121b2995b7d931f5895ca6be848b795deadac6" alt="The news ticker outside the Today Show announces GE's sale of NBC to Comcast, in New York, December 3, 2009. REUTERS/Chip East"
The news ticker outside the Today Show announces GE's sale of NBC to Comcast, in New York, December 3, 2009.
Credit: Reuters/Chip East
Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:42am EDT
(Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of Comcast Corp in an antitrust case over how much it charged cable TV subscribers, in a decision that limits the ability of people to pursue class action lawsuits.
In a 5-4 decision, the court said a group of cable TV subscribers in the Philadelphia area who accused Comcast of overcharging them as part of an effort to monopolize the market was certified improperly, and therefore could not sue as a group.
"The permutations involving four theories of liability and 2 million subscribers located in 16 counties are nearly endless," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority.
The case raised the issue of what kind of evidence must be presented in early stages of a case before a judge can allow a class action to go forward.
Wednesday's decision came in one of several class action cases the court is addressing this term.
They follow a landmark 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores Inc v. Dukes where the court threw out a giant employment discrimination lawsuit because the female plaintiffs did not have enough in common to sue together.
The case is Comcast Corp et al v. Behrend et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 11-864.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York and Lawrence Hurley in Washington; Editing by Vicki Allen)
Related Quotes and News
Company
Price
Related News
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
Comments (0)
Be the first to comment on reuters.com.
Add yours using the box above.
0 comments:
Post a Comment