But others said the changes do not go far enough, noting they do not include Brown's proposal for "hybrid" pensions combining features of traditional pensions and 401(k)-style retirement accounts.
"I hope people acknowledge there is much, much more work to be done," said Joe Nation, a former Democratic member of the state Assembly who now teaches public policy at Stanford University. "It's better than moving backwards but this barely moves the ball forward."
Nation in recent years has overseen studies warning California and its local governments face unfunded pension liabilities that stretch into the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Pension costs are contributing to the financial hardship that pushed Stockton and San Bernardino, two sizeable California cities, to file for bankruptcy this year.
Tackling unfunded pension liabilities will require changes that effect the retirement benefits of current public-sector employees, not just the future employees targeted in the bill, according to Nation.
"Because we are so under water right now there just really has to be more," Nation said.
California lawmakers must vote on the pension bill by midnight Friday, the close of the legislative session.
The legislation will require new public-sector workers to split payments to their pension accounts at least evenly with employers.
Current employees would also be responsible for half their contributions as talks phase in higher payments. Savings to the state from its employees paying more toward their pensions will be used to reduce its unfunded pension liability.
The legislation also will raise retirement ages for new employees and impose new formulas for calculating pensions. That will leave the newly hired with less generous benefits than current workers.
The legislature will also be considering a workers-compensation reform measure.
(Reporting by Jim Christie; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Lisa Shumaker)
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
0 comments:
Post a Comment