Wurzelbacher argued that the file-snooping was an attempt to stifle his political comments and violated his free-speech and privacy rights. But the appeals court disagreed, finding the improper database searches did not amount to a constitutional violation.
"The complaint contains no information regarding what, if any, information was discovered. Moreover, if any information was obtained, it was never publicly disclosed," Judge Richard Griffin wrote for the unanimous three-judge panel.
"It can't be that government officials can rifle through your files without fear of being held accountable," said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, the conservative group that filed the suit for Wurzelbacher. He said attorneys were reviewing the opinion and deciding whether to appeal the case further.
The Ohio Attorney General's Office did not immediately provide a comment.
Earlier this month, Wurzelbacher won the Republican Congressional primary in Ohio's 9th Congressional District, which includes the city of Toledo and surrounding areas. He will go on to face veteran U.S. Representative Marcy Kaptur, the Democratic nominee, in the November election.
(Reporting By Terry Baynes; Editing by Paul Thomasch)
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
0 comments:
Post a Comment