Diallo's attorneys, meanwhile, argue in court papers that Strauss-Kahn enjoyed "limited immunity" at best, a form of protection that would not shield him from criminal or civil prosecution in a sexual assault case. And they point out that the IMF did not assert immunity on Strauss-Kahn's behalf after his arrest.
When Strauss-Kahn was pulled from an Air France flight by New York police May 14, 2011, he told the officers he had diplomatic immunity, according to court documents. Hours later, however, he rescinded his assertion, saying he simply wanted to know whether he needed an attorney.
William Taylor, one of Strauss-Kahn's attorneys, declined to comment. He has previously said that Strauss-Kahn did not attempt to assert his immunity during the criminal case in order to "defend against the false charges and to clear his name."
Diallo's attorneys have argued that his failure to claim immunity when facing jail time undermines the validity of his current argument.
Diallo attorney Kenneth Thompson declined to comment, saying he would stand by the arguments in his legal papers.
(Reporting by Joseph Ax; additional reporting by Lucien Libert in Paris; Editing by Dan Burns)
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
0 comments:
Post a Comment